this chapter answers to the question, (above all the results written in the book) do they actually matter to the real-world thought or behaviour?
Nisebett answers this question by approaching to the real world from different aspects and comparing it to the claims he have made in the book.
his approach varies from medicine to human rights and he is specific in each viewpoint.
my frank reaction to this was that i thought Nisebett must be a perfectionist.
it is important to be perfect and not to have any weak points in articulating something, but his work must have been very dull. i wonder how he picked each aspects of the real world. maybe there were some viewpoints that does not correspond with his claims that Nisebett decided not to refer to.
im sorry that the review for this chapter is shorter than the others:(
ive got to finish my outline!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment